Wow! Kirby Recently Pitched Trump The Idea Of A Possible United-AA Merger

April 14, 2026

In this post Hide

What We Actually Know About A Potential Merger
The Scott Kirby Angle
The Regulatory Mountain
The Hubs Problem
What About Your Miles?
The Pundit’s Mantra
Credit Card Offers

Disclosure: The Points Pundit receives NO compensation from credit card affiliate partnerships. Support the blog by applying for a card through my personal referral links. This article is meant for information purposes only and doesn't constitute personal finance or investment advice. Please consult a licensed professional for advice pertaining to your situation.

United Airlines CEO Scott Kirby pitched the potential for merging with American Airlines in a meeting with President Donald Trump in late February, as per Yahoo Finance. However, the story only broke publicly this week. If it actually happens, very little about the way you fly will stay the same after the merger.

What We Actually Know About A Potential Merger

Kirby has pitched the idea to senior government officials, though it’s unclear if any overtures have since been made or if an actual process is underway to explore a deal. Both United and American have declined to comment. So to be clear, this is not a done deal. It is not even a formal proposal yet. However, the fact that it was floated at the White House level tells you this isn’t just idle chatter either.

If you include international flights, United and American were already the world’s two largest airlines by available capacity in 2025. If you put them together, you are not just creating the biggest airline in the United States, but that combination would create the largest airline on the planet,

The Scott Kirby Angle

Here’s something that makes this story even more interesting. Kirby previously served as American’s president from 2013 to 2016, so he knows exactly what he’d be buying. He knows the hubs, the culture, the debt load and the operational challenges better than almost anyone on the outside. This isn’t a CEO looking at a competitor through a telescope. This is someone who used to run the place.

United has struck a more confident tone as high fuel prices test the industry, with Kirby saying last month that a prolonged cost shock could create opportunities for stronger airlines to gain share as weaker rivals struggle. Reading between the lines, that is Kirby essentially flagging that American, which has been under pressure, could be vulnerable.

The Regulatory Mountain

This deal, if it ever moves forward, will face an enormous regulatory battle.

Any merger between United and American would face intense scrutiny even under the business-friendly Trump administration. The US airline industry is already extraordinarily concentrated. American, Delta, United and Southwest control the bulk of domestic traffic, each with a share of roughly 17%. Combining United and American alone would tip that balance significantly.

Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy has been somewhat encouraging in his public comments, saying “President Trump, he loves to see big deals happen” and that there is room for consolidation in the aviation industry, but he was also careful to add that carriers would need to shed assets if a merger gave one player too much market share.

Critics are already lining up. Ganesh Sitaraman, director of the Vanderbilt Policy Accelerator, said a United-American merger would reduce competition, arguing that fewer choices mean higher ticket prices, more fees and fewer options for travelers.

One reason this story has legs is that American Airlines has a very real financial problem that isn’t going away on its own. The Texas-based carrier carries about $25 billion in long-term debt, more than its larger rivals, leaving it with less financial flexibility as it works through a turnaround. American has been under pressure to improve profitability and close the gap with Delta and United, after unions earlier this year criticized management over lagging returns.

The Hubs Problem

Even if regulators were inclined to bless this deal, the hub situation alone would be a headache. Such a merger would lead to a redraw of major hubs at Chicago O’Hare and Dallas-Fort Worth, two of the busiest airports in the country, where both airlines currently have enormous operations. You cannot have one combined carrier running two massive competing hub operations at the same airports. Something would have to give, and that means route cuts, job implications and significant disruption for travelers in those cities.

What About Your Miles?

This is the question everyone in the loyalty world is going to start asking. MileagePlus and AAdvantage are two of the most valuable loyalty currencies in aviation. A merger would inevitably mean a program consolidation. If history tells us anything about airline mergers and loyalty programs, it tells us that the surviving program tends to look a lot less generous than the one that got absorbed.

We saw it with United and Continental. We saw it with American and US Airways. Devaluations follow consolidation like night follows day.

The Pundit’s Mantra

I am skeptical this gets done, at least in the near term. The regulatory hurdles are genuinely enormous, the debt complexities are significant and the political winds, while more merger-friendly than they were a few years ago, are not unconditional. The fact that American shares rose more than 5% in after-hours trading while United shares were little changed tells you that the market sees American as the beneficiary here, not United.

However, the fact that Kirby took this idea all the way to the Oval Office tells you this is more than a passing thought.

What do you think? Would a United-American merger be good or bad for the average traveler? Tell us in the comments section.

___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________