An old chestnut is the sweeping generalisation that things were better in the past. This certainly applies to people’s perception of airline meals but in this case it may be true.
The late 1990s saw a whole host of innovations introduced and the two with the most lasting influence were lie-flat seats in business class and individual in seat inflight entertainment. The following menu makes me believe the meals may have been better too.
Meals On British Airways
Someone on the BA forum on FlyerTalk posted a picture of a World Traveller menu from the late 1990s. It is probably from 1997 due to the fact it is referencing “our new corporate identity programme” which were the ill fated World Tails, one of which you can see at the top of this post.
It’s All About Perception
It seems fairly simple to me, but it doesn’t take much to make a brand seem to be great quality. Providing a tasteful menu to economy class passengers which describe their meals in a delicious way certainly makes things appear better than they may actually be.
Sure, the whole ethos is to spend as little money as possible on those flying economy as they are actually paying the least. Even so, it is little things like this that can make an airline stand apart from its competitors.
You could say a menu was a waste of paper. On the other hand, you could also say it is a tangible part of the flight. Someone might take it with them and show a friend – if the food was good – and therefore good PR for the airline.
Overall Thoughts
I would argue that a menu in some form should be provided to long haul economy class passengers. Showcasing the meals is always a good thing and as I said above, I think it really adds to the brand.
Perhaps the way forward is to have the flight menu on the entertainment system to save on printing costs. Of course, that means having a modern entertainment system that can be programmed to do this, which is a whole other kettle of fish.
What do you think? Does the menu have the power to change a person’s perception of a flight or am I just talking nonsense? Thanks for reading and if you have any comments or questions, please leave them below.
To never miss a post, you can follow me on Facebook, and I am on Twitter and Instagram too!
All my flight and lounge reviews are indexed here if you want to see more.
Featured image by Dennis HKG on Flickr.
While it would be nice to have a menu in cattle class, you forget that most flyers nowadays only look at cost, and dont look at the benefits provided. If they did, this might fly. Sadly, as long as flyers prioritise cost uber alles, this idea will remain as grounded as the Spruce Goose.
The thing is, I think you can surprise and delight passengers in economy class. Even though they are the cheapest seats, they are still revenue generating and quite a bit of revenue at that. People do prioritise cost, definitely… however recommendations still play a part. Two of my friends who usually fly Qantas to Australia decided to give Qatar Airways a go instead – in economy class – as I think they’re very good.
Now, with the Spruce Goose, there’s an aircraft I must visit one day!
“I would argue that a menu in some form should be provided to long haul economy class passengers. ”
People want low fares, not a menu. Start your airline and tell us it ain’t so!
You are correct, however you can have low fares and have a menu. Some airlines continue to give out a menu in economy class on international flights.
That was then. This is now. British Airways sucks.
That was then indeed, but I wouldn’t go that far. I like flying BA personally, but some don’t like it, so you’re not alone. Thanks for the comment!