The last couple of weeks have been very exciting in the commercial aviation world. Most of the news has centered around the three big alliances: OneWorld, SkyTeam and Star Alliance. One of the biggest headlines was that China Southern was leaving SkyTeam. The airline is part owned by American Airlines, a member of the rival OneWorld alliance. This had been speculated for a while, and probably happened because the Delta-influenced SkyTeam had been putting pressure on China Southern. With their departure, the future alliance participation and partnerships of the airline are in question. I want to look into how China Southern, if it were to join OneWorld, would partner and cooperate with its neighbor Cathay Pacific.
The Arguments Against
Most people are saying that if China Southern joins OW, Cathay will try to block their entry, or leave the alliance all together. This argument has some merits. Cathay is part owned by Air China, a member of Star Alliance. Guangzhou, China Southern’s main hub is just a few hundred miles from Hong Kong. The two airlines could potentially be competing for the same customers, and feeding flights from mainland China to Guangzhou or Hong Kong could be a challenge.
However, I disagree with the fundamental argument that the Air China stake would push CX over to Star Alliance. CX is also part owned by Qatar Airways. Although Qatar has been complaining and threatening to leave OW, I don’t feel like this would happen given the repercussions it could have with their own investment airlines. (AA has joint venture partnerships with BA, IB, and LATAM, all airlines QR owns to a degree). I see it more likely that Cathay will stay in OW, because it is in the interest of both CX and QR to keep the airline in OW.
The Arguments in Favor
This is where I have some ideas as to how the two airlines could cooperate. Currently, Cathay gets mainland China feeder passengers from Air China. Since China Southern and Air China are both state-sponsored enterprises (please correct my terminology if it is wrong), the CAAC would not be likely to oppose the two carriers codesharing with Cathay Pacific. In fact, it would be in Beijing’s political interest to have more connections to Hong Kong, and offer Chinese nationals more connections to the world, given the limitations of the “one route, one carrier policy”.
Further, there can be synchronicity between two hubs close to each other. In the US it works for two airlines. United operated a hub out of Newark and a hub out of Washington Dulles. American operates a hub out of Philadelphia, Washington and New York (both La Guardia and JFK). These airlines have been able to make hubs in close proximity work, and I believe that if the airlines were to cooperate, they could easily make China Southern and Cathay Pacific respective hubs a powerhouse for global aviation.
China’s Plan for the Pearl River Delta
Closer ties between China Southern and Cathay Pacific would likely be seen as a positive by the Chinese authorities. The country is looking to integrate Hong Kong and Macau closer with the mainland. If the largest airline in China, and the largest in Hong Kong, decided to partner up, the government would see it as a step towards the integration they so desperately yearn for. The two airlines could create an airline shuttle between the two airports, similar to shuttles that run between NYC and Boston/DC, LAX and SFO, London and Paris/Frankfurt, among others. There is a strong potential for synergies between the two carriers and there’s no denying it.
Landing Thoughts
Cathay is one of the strongest brands in Hong Kong. China Southern is the largest airline in China. Although unlikely that China Southern will join OneWorld in the short term, there is a lot of potential for cooperation between the two carriers. If the two airlines do decide to cooperate, I suspect that it will be readily approved by the Chinese government. China Southern has a lot to offer American, and OneWorld as a whole, but their current strategy of playing it solo seems to be working out pretty well.
Here is a list of all my flight reviews: The Millennial Traveler Flight Reviews
Here is a list of all my lounge reviews: The Millennial Traveler Lounge Reviews
If you want to stay up to date with the latest airline news follow me on Twitter, Facebook or LinkedIn!
Also follow Travel Update and Boarding Area on Twitter!
Interesting read but fundamentally flawed.
“In fact, it would be in Beijing’s political interest to have more connections to Hong Kong, and offer Chinese nationals more connections to the world, given the limitations of the “one route, one carrier policy”
The decision here is purely based on the interest and potential benefits of the shareholders of CX which is primary the Swire Group. The codeshare agreement between Air China and Cathay is a byproduct of the time when CA wanted to import the operational expertise from Cathay and has nothing to do with network expansion.
“Further, there can be synchronicity between two hubs close to each other. In the US it works for two airlines.”
The crucial point is that even though the distance might be small, CAN and HKG are in 2 different “territories” that have restrictions concerning freedom of moment. Even for Chinese and Hong Kong nationals it would be impossible to travel between CAN and HKG with the extra documentation.
“The two airlines could create an airline shuttle between the two airports, similar to shuttles that run between NYC and Boston/DC, LAX and SFO, London and Paris/Frankfurt, among others. There is a strong potential for synergies between the two carriers and there’s no denying it.”
All of the routes you have mentioned are “domestic/intra schengen flights. For what is worth a CAN-HKG flight is an international flight with all its the hassles and issues. Furthermore a dedicated shuttle flight, just for the purpose of linking between those cities, is already obsolete with the introduction of the newly build Guangzhou–Shenzhen–Hong Kong Express Rail Link.
Once again please take it as constructive criticism, but in the foreseeable future there is no way that the CX board would approve CZ into OW, unless we see a drastic change in shareholder structure.
Hi Kevin! Thanks for reading, and for the constructive criticism.
I have a few rebuttal arguments, hopefully you can clarify if my logic is flawed still or if I am mis-reading the political climate between China and HKG.
To the Fist point: I think that the Swire Group has been looking to offload some of its shares in CX because of the financial issues the carrier has been posting. I know CX recently posted a profit, but there was an article from the South China Morning Post that mentioned it as a possibility.
Regarding the Second and Third Points: As I understand, and please correct me if I am wrong, the purpose of the train link between HKG, Macau and Mainland China was to ease restrictions between entering and leaving both SARs and entering the mainland. I understand that there are less passport restrictions for the train ride, which will in turn translate to the air routes between the three regions. Either way, they could still operate an airs shuttle that could potentially run between the two regions and simply transport people from a third destination (think A-HKG/CAN-CAN/HKG-B).
Thanks again for the input, I really appreciate constructive criticism, as it makes me more informed and a better writer! Have a great day!
Best,
The Millennial Traveler