Inconsistent and ugly seats on British Airways’ Airbus A320neo

The Flight Detective
a row of seats in an airplane

Aircraft cabin interiors are designed to be a showcase of the airline you are flying. The interior elements such as seat design and choice of upholstery usually reinforce the brand.

British Airways have decided to have their new Airbus A320neo cabin feature two types of seats. Up front are the current seats and about half way down the are the new lightweight space saving seats. No big deal, right?

Inconsistency on the A320neo

When I board a flight, I can usually tell which airline I am on. Qantas have a very specific look to their cabins, as does any airline. All the seats look the same in economy class, though some may be upholstered differently.

Have a look at the picture here. This shows the transition from the elegant seats currently in use, to the new space saving seats that have been installed.

What were they thinking? While I can live with the reality of space saving seats for short flights, leaving it looking cheap is not particularly good.

Surely there would have been some attempt to match the fabric colour to the brown of the leather upholstered seats. Even adding the British Airways Speedmarque to the headrest would help.

Overall Thoughts

When I first saw this picture, I was bewildered by how ugly it looks. Yes, people are going to be sitting in the seats, so you’re not really going to notice it too much when the flight is full. But really?

Enhancing revenue and saving money by using these new types of seats is understandable, airlines are a business that need to make money. However, I think more care needs to be taken when it comes to passenger facing elements of the product.

What do you think of these seats on the A320neo? Thank you for reading and if you have any comments or questions, please leave them below.

To never miss a post, follow me on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.
All my flight and lounge reviews are indexed here so check them out!

Images via GLABA on FlyerTalk.

Total
0
Shares
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

15 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

[…] it right to advertise one thing and provide another entirely? Is it appropriate to do so when the difference is very visible? Is it sensible or decent to make it quite so pointed a difference, without any visible cabin […]

David Adams

Mmm… just flew LHR – LCA on BA’s A320 neo, in those infamous slimline seats. Row 18 seat ‘D’. Now, we fly BA all over the place (mainly short haul), and I can honestly say that this seat is the tightest I’ve ever had with them. I’m 6ft 2in and 14 stone, so not massive – however, my knees were pressed into the seat in front for the full 4.5 hour trip. I say thank heavens they don’t recline (doesn’t stop some inconsiderate so-and-so’s trying though, he he). Anyway, not happy with what appears to be less legroom, and I… Read more »

Mr K

The seats aren’t actually that bad to sit in on a short flight. Yes, they don’t recline but they are semi reclined already. My issue is the tray table, I use my iPad to watch a movie on the flight, that’s the table space gone. So don’t buy anything, there is no where to put it now there isnt a lip in the seat back to hang your device. You know what one of the main problems is with the cabins and the toilets, is that everyone complains on forums, does anyone actually complain to the airline it’s self? And… Read more »

PCTRAVELER

Swiss started the decline in seat quality and comfort with their RECARO city bus -style sardine seats many years ago. Since then it’s been downhill for many airlines, with the race to compete in how many sardines they could fit into an aircraft, The race for the hardest and most uncomfortable seats started with Continental’s rock seats in1990’s transpacific flights, which was probably a nostalgic return to the concept of wooden seats in 1800 trains! It seems many airlines in the race for profit and/or survival will ditch the concept of seat comfort. Tradition is out, and remains only as… Read more »

Evan

Well yes they don’t look very nice. Is this a way for BA to differentiate Club Europe from Euro Traveller? After all the current seats are the same with no extra legroom.

MFB123

Everything a company does adds or subtracts from the perceived value of the product and more importantly, the brand. To me, this screams “cheap”. It says “we get you from point A to point B…be thankful and shut up”. That’s fine if you are a LCC with the strategy of attracting the bottom of the barrel traveler wanting to spen $49 for a weekend gambling trip to Gulfport, MS; but BA wants the business traveler to Tel Aviv and will try charging an arm and a leg for this seat. They are shooting themselves and their strategy in the foot.… Read more »

Christian

I’m less concerned with the appearance than the comfort of the seats. I agree that it doesn’t look very nice, but I’ll take ugly but comfortable on any plane over the reverse. Sadly, if these are slimline seats, it’s the worst of both worlds.

Miss Jay

Not only they are “slimline” seats, the armrests are shorter, seats don’t recline and headrests are missing completely. Last two rows do not have windows. Oh and good luck trying to fit into bathroom that’s got jump seat attached to the door, it’s super tiny. I am 172cm 55kg and felt almost claustrophobic in that space. I commute to London Heathrow to work and to my great regret BA is the only airline that flies there. If I had the choice I would be taking my custom elswhere in a heartbeat. Travelling on BA neo aircraft is beyond awfull. And… Read more »

Previous Post
a clothespin holding a sign

The One Thing all Point Earners Should Do

Next Post
a man and woman standing in front of a large circular building

Delta Amex Membership Rewards Offer, Get $60 after $300

More Posts by: The Flight Detective