The aviation industry is quite good at keeping terms non-gender specific. For example, steward and stewardess have become flight attendant or cabin crew, which applies to both sexes. Not so much with NOTAM though.
NOTAM is an abbreviation of “Notice to Airmen”, a communication which is issued to pilots. It is specifically issued to air “men”, which presumably means female pilots can ignore them.
What Is A NOTAM?
The International Civil Aviation Organization, more commonly known as ICAO, defines the term like this. “A notice to airmen (NOTAM) is a notice containing information concerning the establishment, condition or change in any aeronautical facility, service, procedure or hazard, the timely knowledge of which is essential to personnel concerned with flight operations.”
Alternatives to NOTAM
To include the lady pilots, perhaps the Notice to Airmen should be a Notice to Aircrew, a NOTAC. Another possibility could be Notice to Pilots, but NOTP doesn’t really roll off the tongue in conversation very well.
Overall Thoughts
Certain things in aviation change at a slow pace, so I would not be surprised to see NOTAM around for a long time. That being said, in our 21st century world of woke culture and awareness, perhaps this archaic little gem should be retired and replaced.
What do you think of NOTAM? Keep it or ditch it? Any ideas for a replacement? Thank you for reading and if you have any comments or questions, please leave them below.
Like planes? See my “Does anyone remember” series.
Flight reviews your thing? Mine are all indexed here.
Follow me on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.
Featured image by Pattharapong Sittirach via Wikimedia Commons.
Notice to Airmen by Bernard Bill5 via Wikimedia Commons.
Turkey by the FAA via Wikimedia Commons.
Right when I thought political correctness couldn’t go any further…I continue to be amazed. This is ridiculous, especially when there are actual issues to tackle in aviation.
Thanks for your comment!
You are wrong in many aspects. Some were already pointed out. But the biggest thing is how you use words. Start using them as a tool and not have them influence your perception.
The fact alone that you wrote all this, show to me that you have nothing better to do than to bend words and perceptions and make it look like everyone uses these words in the way you critique it.
Give me a break. Why would you think that women cant be airmen? Thats rather sexist of you tbh.
Of course women can be airmen, they already are under the term. That wasn’t really the point of the post, but thanks for your input.
Im all for equality of the sexes, but at some point this whole woke thing goes more than a bit nuts.
Theres always something to be offended about in todays world.
Absolutely agree – the thing is, this doesn’t offend me. It just occurred to me and so here we are.
Well, how about unmanned aircraft? Or man the controls?
Add them to the list then! Thanks for mentioning those.
LOL. Youre really going to get something rolling here.
Hahaha! And while we’re at it, who needs the English language!
When someone Googles the term “First World Problems”, this should be the first thing that pops up.
Hahaha! Indeed!
Oh, I hope the virus kills us all. If we don’t have any problems we make up stupid stuff like this. It comes from historic times and I am sure that a normal person doesn’t really care that it says man in it.
Remember no woman/women are possible without man/men. Therefore, we have to kill all genders completely. I am so surprised that nobody cared yet to rename “woman” or “women” It’s the best example that this whole ordeal is stupid. All these people who want to change something, think about climate change, help poor and starving kids in third-world countries. I am sure they don’t care if their food gets there via a NOTAM or NOTAC or whatever you want to call it.
I hear you on all of that – appreciate the response!
“man” does not exclude female pilots. “Man” in English also refers to humans, humankind, in general – from “mann” in Proto-Germanic. In Old English “wermann” was for males and “wifmann” for females. At some point the “wer” was dropped from “wermann” for males but this doesn’t change the meaning of “man (mann)” Stop looking for things to be offended about, there are actual problems to worry about.
I’m not offended at all, it is just something that occurred to me. I certainly appreciate your deep dive into the history of the term man though, fascinating stuff. From a general usage perspective though, people will see man referring to male humans, and I’m pretty certain it came about to be meant that way too, when you consider aviation history and the time the term appeared. Great comment though, I love learning new things!